Abstract
A generalization g(s+t)x(u) = g(s)x(t+u) (s, t, u R) of the functional equation of the mean sun is studied, where a group G acts on a set X, (R, +) is a not necessarily commutative group and both x : R X and g : R G are unknown functions, which will be determined by the equation. 
Local solar time is measured by a sundial. When the center of the sun is on an observer’s meridian, the observer’s local solar time is zero hours (noon). Because the earth moves with varying speed in its orbit at different times of the year and because the plane of the earth’s equator is inclined to its orbital plane, the length of the solar day is different depending on the time of year. It is more convenient to define time in terms of the average of local solar time. Such time, called mean solar time, may be thought of as being measured relative to an imaginary sun (the mean sun) that lies in the earth’s equatorial plane and about which the earth orbits with constant speed. Every mean solar day is of the same length.^{1}
In [5, 2] it is shown that the mean sun satisfies the functional equation
where y(s) is a vector of length 1 which is the direction from the center of the earth to the sun at the time s (one day corresponds to 2) expressed in a geocentric coordinate system. As a basis of this system we can choose two orthogonal vectors in the equatorial plane and one vector along the axis of the earth. M(, ) is the matrix
Then M(, )y(s) is the direction from the earth to the sun expressed in a local coordinate system on the surface of the earth in the point of longitude and latitude . This local coordinate frame is given by the unit vectors indicating the directions East, North, and to the zenith.
In the present paper we investigate a generalization of this equation for fixed . To be more precise, we will deal with the following problem:
Let (G, ^{.}) be a group acting on a set X (cf. [1, 3, 4, 6]) and let (R, +) be a not necessarily commutative group. Find all functions x : R X and g : R G, which satisfy
 (1) 
which satisfies 1x = x and (_{2}_{1})x = _{2}(_{1}x) for all x X and _{1}, _{2} G, where 1 is the identity element in G. In other words, a group action describes a homomorphism from G to the set of all bijections on X, which is a group together with the composition of functions as the multiplication in the group. Conversely, each homomorphism of this kind determines a group action of G on X.
A group action of G on X defines an equivalence relation on X. Two elements x_{1}, x_{2} of x are called Gequivalent, x_{1} ~ _{G}x_{2}, if and only if there is some G such that x_{2} = x_{1}. The equivalence classes G(x) with respect to ~ _{G} are called orbits of G on X, i.e.
For each x X the stabilizer G_{x} of x, which is the set
is a subgroup of G.
Two elements x and y of the same orbit have conjugate stabilizers. To be more precise, if y = x for G, then G_{y} = G_{x}^{1}.
Coming back to the functional equation (1), we start with collecting some properties of the functions g and x. Later we determine all solutions g and x of (1). In a first step we replace g by another function h : R G, defined by
The properties of h are described in
Lemma 1. Assume that (g, x) is a solution of (1). Then the function h, defined above, satisfies h(0) = 1 G,
 (2) 
 (3) 
It is also possible to determine g by h.
Lemma 2. If the functions x : R X and h : R G satisfy (2), then for arbitrary g_{0} G the function g : R G defined by g(r) := g_{0}h(r) together with x satisfies (1).
For the rest of the paper we will work with h instead of g. As was indicated earlier, for x X let G_{x} denote the stabilizer of x. From (3) we deduce that ^{1}h(s + t) G_{ x(u)} for all u R and all s, t R. In other words
Using this for t = s, we see that there exists _{s} , such that h(s)^{1} = h(s)_{ s}. And for s = t there is _{t}' , such that h(t)^{1} = _{ t}'h(t).
Let H := <h(R)> and := H, then the following lemma holds.
So it is enough to prove that h(r)h(r)^{1} < and h(r)^{1}h(r) < for all r R. Let r, u R and , then there is a _{r}' , such that h(r)h(r)^{1}x(u) = h(r)_{r}'h(r)x(u) = h(r)_{ r}'x(r + u) = h(r)x(r + u) = x(r  r + u) = x(u), since _{r}' stabilizes each element of the form x(t). This means, since was an arbitrary element of , that
so h(r)h(r)^{1} < H = . For the second part of the proof similar arguments can be used.
This permits to define a function from R to the factor group H/ by
In order to prove that is surjective let
Then
and _{ i = 1}^{n}j_{i} ^{.} r_{i} R.
Even the following result is true.
Lemma 5. If a subgroup N of G_{x(0)} is a normal subgroup of H, then N is a subgroup of .
So far we derived necessary conditions for solutions of (2). Before describing sufficient conditions we prove a general result about group actions.
Lemma 6. Consider a group G acting on a set X. Let S be a subgroup of G, x_{0} an arbitrary element of X, and N a normal subgroup of S, such that N is a subgroup of the stabilizer G_{x0}. Then the factor group S/N acts on the orbit S(x_{0}) in the following way:
 (4) 
we derive that the action of on H(x_{0}) does not depend on the special choice of the representative of . Furthermore, it is clear that x_{0} = 1x_{0} = x_{0}, and ( _{1} _{2})x_{0} = _{1}_{2}x_{0} = (_{1}_{2})x_{0} = _{1}(_{2})x_{0} = _{1}(_{2}x_{0}) = _{1}( _{2}x_{0}) for all _{ 1}, _{2} S/N.
Under the assumptions of the last lemma, N is a subgroup of each stabilizer G_{x0} for S, since
Lemma 7. Let G, x_{0}, S and N be given as in Lemma 6 and let : R S/N be a homomorphism. When defining the two functions x and h by x(r) := (r)x_{0}, and h(r) being an arbitrary element in the coset (r) for r R, then h and x satisfy (2).
Finally all these results are summarized in
Theorem 8. The functions x : R X and h : R G satisfy (2) if and only if there exist x_{0} X, a subgroup S of G, a normal subgroup N of S, which is a subgroup of the stabilizer G_{x0}, and a homomorphism : R S/N, such that
where the natural action of the factor group S/R on the orbit S(x_{0}) is described by (4).
The rest of the present theorem follows immediately from Lemma 7.
Acknowledgement: The author wants to express his thanks to Professor Jens Schwaiger for useful comments and hints while preparing this article.
[1] P.M. Cohn. Algebra, volume 3. J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester etc., 2nd edition, 1989. ISBN 0471101699.
[2] H. Fripertinger and J. Schwaiger. Some applications of functional equations in astronomy. Grazer Mathematische Berichte, 344 (2001), 16.
[3] S. Lang. Algebra. Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 3rd edition, 1993. ISBN 0201555409.
[4] K. Meyberg. Algebra. Teil 1. Carl Hanser Verlag, München, Wien, 2nd edition, 1980. ISBN 3446119655.
[5] J. Schwaiger. Some applications of functional equations in astronomy. Aequationes Mathematicae, 60 (2000), p. 185. In Report of the meeting: The Thirtyseventh International Symposium on Functional Equations, May 1623, 1999, Huntington, WV.
[6] M. Suzuki. Group Theory I. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften 247. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1982. ISBN 3540109153.
HARALD FRIPERTINGER
